AI-Powered Rhetorical Analysis

See what any text
is really saying.

FrameFinder surfaces framing patterns, loaded language, and missing perspectives in any article, speech, essay, or transcript. Not just “biased” — how and why.

Try a Free Scan View Sample Report

Built for AP Lang · AP Gov · History · Debate · Model UN

Framing lens

Loaded language

Weak evidence

Missing perspective

FrameFinder Analysis

LIVE

Input · 97 words

This reckless policy will destroy student independence and lead to disastrous consequences. These draconian measures strip teenagers of their autonomy. Any reasonable person can see this policy was created by out-of-touch administrators.

Framing Lens

Student freedom vs. administrative control

Loaded Language

8/10

Evidence Quality

2/10

Emotional Framing

9/10

Risk:Medium-High

“reckless”“draconian”“destroy”

Scan complete100%

From messy rhetoric to clear analysis.

Hover any highlighted phrase to see the technique being used.

Source Text

7 issues detected

This reckless policy will destroy student independence and lead to disastrous consequences. These draconian measures strip teenagers of their autonomy at a critical developmental stage. Any reasonable person can see that this policy was created by out-of-touch administrators who have forgotten what it means to be young. The research is clear: students need their phones for safety, learning, and communication.

High impact

Medium impact

Hover to inspect

FrameFinder ReportMedium-High Risk

Topic

School Phone Ban Policy

Framing Lens

Student freedom vs. administrative control

Loaded Language · 6 detected

reckless policy·Hdisastrous consequences·Hdraconian measures·Hout-of-touch administrators·HAny reasonable person·MThe research is clear·M

Weak Evidence

“Students need their phones.”

UnsupportedNo study cited — asserted as fact.

“The research is clear.”

WeakVague appeal to unnamed research.

Missing Perspectives

Teachers who support restrictions
Students who favour phone-free focus
Academic performance data
Safety protocol alternatives

Live

FrameFinder Analysis Engine

Analytical dimensions

Loaded language patterns

Topic categories

How it works

Three steps from raw text to rhetorical insight.

Paste Your Text

Drop in any article, speech, essay, or transcript. Free users get up to 800 words — Pro gets full-length documents, PDFs, and YouTube transcripts.

FrameFinder Analyzes

AI scans for framing patterns, loaded language, evidence quality, missing perspectives, and logical fallacies — going deeper than any simple bias label.

Read Your Report

A structured report with framing summary, scored bias indicators, and phrase-level analysis. Enable Socratic Mode to receive guiding questions instead of answers.

Six layers. One clean report.

Each dimension stacks into a single readable output — not a score, a structured explanation.

Framing Lens

Topic, angle, tone, and stance — the full picture before any phrase is flagged.

Framing Output

LENSStudent freedom vs. control

TONEAdvocacy · Persuasive

STANCEStrongly Against

SUBJECTEducational policy

Full framing profile extractedComplete

Loaded Language

Every emotionally charged phrase flagged, impact-rated, and explained.

This reckless policy will destroy independence — what any reasonable person can see.

“reckless policy”HIGH

“destroy”HIGH

“draconian”HIGH

“any reasonable”MED

7 terms flagged · 5 high impactCharged

Claims vs Evidence

Asserted facts mapped against actual support — or the absence of it.

Claims Audit

"Students need phones"Unsupported

"Research is clear"Vague

"Safety requires access"No source

3 claims reviewed2 unsupported

Fallacy Detection

Named and placed: ad hominem, false authority, appeal to fear, and more.

Detected Fallacies

Ad Hominem"out-of-touch admins"

Appeal to Fear"disastrous consequences"

False Consensus"any reasonable person"

3 fallacies identifiedReview logic

Missing Perspectives

Whose voices are absent — the dimension that simple bias labels always miss.

Absent Voices

Teachers supporting ban

Phone-free student voices

Academic performance data

+ 1 more absent voice

4 perspectives missingOne-sided

Neutral Rewrite

The same sentence without the freight — proof of what the language was doing.

Loadedoriginal

“reckless policy will destroystudent independence...”

Neutralrewritten

“policy may reducestudent autonomy in some contexts...”

4 phrases neutralisedBalanced

Built for critical thinkers

Designed around the analytical skills your courses actually assess.

AP Lang Students

Identify rhetorical appeals, loaded diction, and framing strategies in non-fiction texts. Build the analytical vocabulary your exam demands.

Rhetorical AnalysisLoaded DictionAP Exam Prep

AP Gov & History

Analyze political speeches, news articles, and primary sources for agenda framing, selective evidence, and propaganda techniques.

Political FramingPrimary SourcesMedia Literacy

Debate & Model UN

Spot logical fallacies and weak evidence in opposing arguments. Build rebuttals grounded in what the text actually claims — and fails to prove.

Fallacy DetectionArgument AnalysisRebuttal Prep

Teachers & Educators

Use Socratic Mode to generate discussion questions from any text. Create assignments that develop media literacy without handing students the answers.

Socratic ModeDiscussion PromptsMedia Literacy

Deeper than “biased” or “unbiased”

Six analytical modules — each one showing you the how of persuasion, not just a verdict.

Loaded Language7 flagged

This reckless policy will destroy student independence and cause disastrous consequences. These draconian measures ignore what any reasonable person can plainly see.

reckless policydestroydraconiandisastrousany reasonable...+2 more

Fallacy Detection3 detected

Ad HominemHIGH

"out-of-touch administrators"

Appeal to FearHIGH

"disastrous consequences"

False ConsensusMED

"any reasonable person"

PDF Analysis4 pages

PDF

school_phone_policy.pdf

247 KB · 4 pages

Scanning

Extracting text82%

Text preview

“The proposed ban on student mobile devices represents a significant overreach of administrative authority, with devastating effectson student communication...”

3 flagged phrases in first paragraph

Claims Audit3 reviewed

ClaimVerdict

"Students need phones for safety."UNSUPPORTED

"The research is absolutely clear."VAGUE

"This ban will lead to a crisis."SPECULATION

Missing Perspectives3 of 4 absent

Stakeholder voices in text3 of 4 absent

Teachers supporting the banABSENT

Phone-free student voicesABSENT

Academic performance researchABSENT

School safety coordinators

Source Comparison2 sources

SOURCE A

The Student Chronicle

Freedom at Risk as Phone Ban Looms Over Classrooms

recklessdestroydraconiandisastrous

Stance: Against

SOURCE B

Education Research Weekly

Phone-Free Classrooms Improve Focus, New Data Shows

evidence-basedmeasuredresearch-backedstructured

Stance: For

Stance divergence

Against

For

Loaded language

A: 8 terms · B: 1 term

Framing lens

“freedom” vs “evidence”

Simple, student-friendly pricing

Start free. Upgrade when you need more depth.

Free

$0/ month

Start developing your rhetorical eye.

3 Quick Scans / month
800-word text limit
Framing summary
Bias risk score
3 loaded language highlights

Get Started Free

No credit card required

See what any textis really saying.

From messy rhetoric to clear analysis.

How it works

Paste Your Text

FrameFinder Analyzes

Read Your Report

Six layers. One clean report.

Framing Lens

Loaded Language

Claims vs Evidence

Fallacy Detection

Missing Perspectives

Neutral Rewrite

Built for critical thinkers

AP Lang Students

AP Gov & History

Debate & Model UN

Teachers & Educators

Deeper than “biased” or “unbiased”

Simple, student-friendly pricing

See what any text
is really saying.